Jewel rewards are screwy. I made a small error in my initial computations, but I'm still gonna go ahead and say that raising the jewels per word reward for each job to some consistent number which is around 50 jewels is a good idea since some things are really expensive on this site.. At 50 jewels per post it takes ~800 words to be able to afford a spell slot which effectively comes out to 2 D-Rank jobs. One 10 year job would yield 550,000 jewels which is enough to afford a single ancient scroll which seems pretty reasonable to me. One 100 year would yield 625,000 jewels and thus it would take 8 without modifiers to afford a guild (which requires staff approval so there's no worry about everyone just flippin' buying a guild). I feel like this change would put the various shop items on the site within reasonable reach.
Jewels / word for D-100 year Jobs for either solo or groups of two
D-Rank : 10 Jewels / word
C-Rank : 13.3 Jewels / word
B-Rank : 11.4 Jewels / word
A-Rank : 10.7 Jewels / word
S-Rank : 12.5 Jewels / word
10 Year: 27.3 Jewels / word
100 Year: 16 Jewels / word
Numbers were based one MINIMUM word count and MAXIMUM jewel reward
too math;didn't read: Make the jewel per word count 50 J/word for jobs and, if that's too high, at least make the jewel/word count consistent (with perhaps a small exception for 10 years because they're designed for that JEWEL GRIND)
Jewels / word for D-100 year Jobs for either solo or groups of two
D-Rank : 10 Jewels / word
C-Rank : 13.3 Jewels / word
B-Rank : 11.4 Jewels / word
A-Rank : 10.7 Jewels / word
S-Rank : 12.5 Jewels / word
10 Year: 27.3 Jewels / word
100 Year: 16 Jewels / word
Numbers were based one MINIMUM word count and MAXIMUM jewel reward
too math;didn't read: Make the jewel per word count 50 J/word for jobs and, if that's too high, at least make the jewel/word count consistent (with perhaps a small exception for 10 years because they're designed for that JEWEL GRIND)
Last edited by King Zenshin on 18th November 2018, 2:51 pm; edited 2 times in total (Reason for editing : Ppffttt I made a small computational error)